Michelle Pemberton/The Indianapolis Star/USA Right now Community
Dr. Caitlin Bernard testifies on Thursday, Might 25, 2023.
CNN
—
An Indianapolis physician who publicly revealed she supplied abortion providers to a 10-year-old Ohio rape sufferer final yr has been reprimanded and fined by Indiana’s medical licensing board after it decided the disclosure violated federal and state affected person privateness legal guidelines.
The board on Thursday discovered Dr. Caitlin Bernard, an obstetrician-gynecologist, liable on three counts of violating affected person privateness legal guidelines after Indiana Lawyer Common Todd Rokita filed a criticism towards the physician in November.
Nevertheless, the board dismissed two different allegations within the criticism, figuring out she didn’t violate legal guidelines requiring physicians to instantly report suspected youngster abuse and hold abreast of necessary reporting and affected person privateness legal guidelines.
Bernard shall be fined $3,000 and obtain a letter of reprimand, in keeping with the board, which agreed to permit her to proceed working towards medication.
The criticism alleged that Bernard violated affected person privateness legislation when she mentioned the case of the woman with out the consent of the affected person or a guardian – even whereas not utilizing her identify – over the summer time with the Indianapolis Star.
The disclosure of why the Ohio woman made her medical journey to Indiana, days after the US Supreme Court docket overturned Roe v. Wade and ended the federal proper to abortion, helped make Bernard a part of nationwide debate over abortion rights within the county.
Bernard advised CNN final yr that she supplied abortion providers to the kid in late June, and that the woman traveled to Indiana for the process as a result of Ohio, after the Roe ruling, typically banned abortions after early cardiac exercise is detected, which is round six weeks right into a being pregnant. The woman was six weeks and three days into her being pregnant, Bernard mentioned.
On the time of the process, Indiana allowed abortions as much as 20 weeks after fertilization. The state then handed a legislation that may ban abortion in any respect levels of being pregnant with restricted exceptions for rape or incest or to avoid wasting the girl’s life, stop any critical well being danger to the girl and for deadly fetal abnormalities. Nevertheless, that legislation was quickly blocked, pending court docket fights.
The case rapidly grew to become a flashpoint within the post-Roe conflict over abortion rights. A number of GOP politicians and media retailers initially forged skepticism on Bernard’s claims till a person was charged with raping the kid and an Ohio detective testified that the woman had undergone an abortion in Indianapolis.
The Indiana medical licensing board’s president on Thursday spoke about supporting a sanction towards Bernard.
“My cause to suggest a letter of reprimand could be that I don’t assume she anticipated this to go viral,” the board’s president, Dr. John Strobel, mentioned throughout deliberations. “I don’t assume she anticipated this consideration to be dropped at this affected person.”
“However I do assume that we as physicians have to be extra cautious on this scenario,” Strobel mentioned. “I feel she’s a very good physician. … I feel she’s secure to return to follow.”
Cory Voight, co-director of the lawyer basic workplace’s complicated litigation division, mentioned the criticism centered on Bernard’s choice “to discuss her affected person to a reporter for the biggest newspaper in Indiana.”
“The impact of that call is everybody, the nation, realized about her affected person. Realized {that a} 10-year-old little woman was raped and had an abortion,” Voight mentioned in his opening remarks.
The criticism requested the licensing board to impose “applicable disciplinary motion,” however didn’t request a selected penalty.
Bernard’s lawyer has dismissed Rokita’s criticism as a “last-ditch effort to intimidate” her and different abortion suppliers. Bernard maintained that she didn’t launch protected particulars concerning the youngster.
“I didn’t launch any protected well being data. I complied with all affected person confidentiality and HIPAA legal guidelines to one of the best of my information,” Bernard testified on Thursday. “And, once more, there was no data that I launched that led to her being recognized.”
Bernard’s employer, Indiana College Well being, mentioned in July that it reviewed the case and decided the physician was “in compliance with privateness legal guidelines.”
The criticism alleged that Bernard didn’t observe the proper procedures of reporting youngster abuse to Indiana authorities after the abortion providers have been carried out.
After deliberations on Thursday, the state medical board concluded that Bernard didn’t violate the procedures and located her not liable.
Bernard advised the board she instantly notified a hospital social employee concerning the attainable abuse. The social employee testified that she contacted officers in Ohio, the place the abuse occurred, and that authorities there have been already investigating the case.
Bernard reported the abortion process to the Indiana Division of Well being on July 2 – two days after it was carried out – as required by the division, in keeping with company paperwork obtained by CNN.
She advised the licensing board Thursday that she additionally submitted the report, which famous the abuse, to Indiana’s Division of Baby Companies. The division beforehand declined to publicly verify whether or not it obtained a report from Bernard, citing confidentiality legislation.
